Pilot Online Learning
creates eLearning products that teach, test, assess, and prescribe.

What is mutual learning especially effective for?

Mutual learning allows you to learn, to come to better decisions with other interested parties or stakeholders.

It is useful in every single situation where there is potential conflict. I use it in every interaction and new opportunity. By using it, I better understand what others need from me, they better understand what I need from them, and we all have better access to the information we need to come up with an optimal decision.

Mutual Learning may not be good in certain crisis situations where it is more important to decide fast than to get input from others.

Can you boil it down to a few basic principles?

There are three basic principles: curiosity, transparence, and joint accountability.

1. Curiosity – really being inquisitive, asking yourself, what is the other person thinking, why is he or she thinking that, why is he saying what he is saying, what is he seeing that you don’t see. This means suspending judgment; when you hear another person’s idea it’s easy to say, “that’s wrong” or “that’s irrelevant.” Mutual learning means wanting to know why the person is saying that, what does he know that you don’t and how could that information teach you something that will help you get what you want.
2. Transparency – saying what you think and feel, not compromising, not camouflaging what you are saying. Let’s say a person says something very aggressive, like “You’re not explaining things correctly. This doesn’t mean you should say, “you idiot” if you are angry; or “you’re wrong” if you disagree. In mutual learning, transparency is more like, “when you say that I don’t understand what I did or said that provoked you.” You reveal that the statement had an emotional impact, but it still moves the dialog forward.
3. Joint accountability – If you are trying to resolve an issue or take an action that involves an other person or group, each of you has to be accountable. Each person or group is accountable to the other; you have to work together even if you see things differently. According to the model, there is no resolution unless both commit to the decision, unless both are accountable. This doesn’t mean that both parties have to agree with every aspect of a decision. For example, you may have a different approach to a problem that you feel is superior but your boss has the decision making power, your commitment is to help her succeed.